Security Consulting

For everyone who doesn’t see security as just a feature.

In a time where systems are merging, interfaces multiplying, and external dependencies increasing, not only does complexity rise—but more importantly, the attack surface expands. Technologies that once stood alone are now part of dynamic ecosystems.
That’s exactly what makes them vulnerable.

Action figure of a Mandalorian-style character with a blurred red background.

Security is not optional. It’s critical to survival.

In September 2024, the German Air Traffic Control (DFS) became the target of a targeted attack. While flight operations were not affected, internal systems were significantly disrupted. Prior to that, over 3.8 GB of sensitive corporate data had been leaked from the Federal Statistical Office—via a platform previously considered secure. The current 2024 BSI Situation Report confirms this. The threat level for IT infrastructures remains high, with increasing attack activity and growing technical sophistication.

The conclusion is clear: those who treat security as a side issue risk far more than just data loss.

Close-up of a cat’s green eye peering through a soft, colorful blur in green and blue tones.

Complexity demands clarity.

Many technical leaders today face system landscapes they didn’t design themselves. These environments have evolved historically—fragmented, partially documented, and often inconsistently structured. Over 60% of productive systems are made up of components that were never centrally planned. Outdated components are hard to patch and account for around 40% of all security incidents. Access rights have accumulated over the years rather than being purposefully modeled. Only 21% of companies have comprehensive access management in place.

This creates vulnerabilities exactly where no one is looking—until it’s too late.

Illustration featuring a signage stating Danger High Voltage

(In)visible Danger

As long as everything works, this reality is rarely questioned. But when an incident occurs, the responsibility falls on the technical leadership—even if the root causes are structural.

You’re responsible for systems others have built, expanded, or abandoned. For dependencies that were never documented. For risks that were never explicitly stated, but always silently accepted.

As long as nothing happens, this remains invisible. But when something does happen, no one asks how it happened—only who is responsible now.

Security emerges where systems come back together.

In fragmented system landscapes, risks arise at interfaces, in exceptions, and in dependencies that were never formalized. Security gaps don’t emerge due to a lack of measures, but due to a lack of visibility, unclear responsibilities, and misplaced technical trust.
Such structures can’t be secured with more tools—they require systemic intervention—structural, architectural, and forward-looking.

That’s exactly where we come in:

We analyze how existing components interact and where they block or overwhelm each other. We connect what’s isolated. We close gaps that were never noticed. We add what was never planned and turn it into a sustainable whole.

We integrate. We orchestrate. We secure. Not as a service provider, but as your technical sparring partner.

isplay of Captain America’s iconic red, white, and blue shield under a spotlight in a dark setting.

Responsibility remains. But it becomes manageable.

When architecture, access, and risk zones are systematically reorganized, not only does the system change—but also the way responsibility is managed. Access models become understandable and verifiable. Dependencies become visible, documented, and controllable. Security-critical components can be protected specifically—not reactively, but proactively.

Audits become plannable instead of tactical. Updates lose their risk factor. Security no longer contradicts development speed—it becomes part of the architecture.

Our security consulting is for technical leaders who are responsible for complex, networked systems—and want to secure them structurally.

Architecture instead of ad hoc fixes

We don’t patch symptoms—we question structures. For us, security is an architectural matter—not a technical add-on.

Clarity on access and accountability

We model access rights in a comprehensible and verifiable way—with a focus on governance, role logic, and actual behavior in the system.

Making risk zones visible

We identify security gaps where they are often overlooked in evolved systems: at interfaces, in exceptions, in inherited dependencies.

Technical depth without tool dogma

We work technology-agnostically—with engineering experience and methodological discipline, not with prepackaged toolchains.

Pragmatic, without compromising security

We align security with development, operations, and product—in an integrated, traceable, and realistically implementable way.

Security becomes
sustainable

Security becomes an integral part of your system landscape. You no longer retroactively secure—you build with foresight.

The best answers start with smart questions

Let’s talk about your system. We’ll gladly show you how security can become part of your architecture.

Request a non-binding consultation now